Viktor Durasovic vs Ajeet Rai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

The upcoming tennis match presents a fascinating opportunity to delve into the players' recent performances and draw comparisons based on statistics. Examining the second serve performance over the last six months, Rai has achieved a win rate of 41.81% on their second serve points, while Durasovic has outperformed slightly with 45.07%. This particular metric holds significant weight in predicting the likely winner of matches.

When analyzing the return game statistics during recent form, Rai has excelled at winning 47.58% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Durasovic has secured 45.5% in the same category. The first serve return stats are closely matched, with Rai achieving 27.2% and Durasovic slightly higher at 27.57%. Such statistics offer valuable insights when determining the favored player in this head-to-head confrontation.

Delving into how each player performs under pressure, Rai has managed to save 52.49% of breakpoints recently, whereas Durasovic boasts a more impressive 58.79% breakpoint save rate. This statistic can be particularly informative for in-game betting predictions as it reflects mental fortitude during critical points.

Examining their overall match performance over the past year, Rai has secured victory in 59.15% of their encounters (42 wins to 29 losses), whereas Durasovic has demonstrated slightly better form with a win rate of 61.11% (44 wins to 28 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive view of their head-to-head prediction.

Player surface preferences and career performances add further context. Rai boasts a 57% win rate on Hard courts (161 wins to 122 losses), marking this as their best surface, while Durasovic shines brightest with a 63% win rate on Hard (180 wins to 107 losses). Conversely, Rai struggles on I.hard, with a win rate of 33%, and Durasovic finds their biggest challenge on Grass, with no wins.

Considering tournament levels, Rai has predominantly played and succeeded at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a win rate of 62.96% (34 wins to 20 losses). Similarly, Durasovic has participated in the same level events, with a nearly identical win rate of 62.79% (27 wins to 16 losses), which is crucial for relative event-level comparisons.

Opponent quality also plays a role, as Rai's average opponent over the past year had a rank of 443.8, while Durasovic faced slightly tougher competition with an average rank of 424.61. Should the match extend into a deciding set, Durasovic seems to hold an advantage, having won 63% of such scenarios compared to Rai's 53% success rate.

Evaluating current event statistics can also provide insights into form. Should any information be available from their current event performance, it should be considered, as some players tend to excel in specific competitions. Moreover, when it comes to break point conversion, Rai has a recent form rate of 34.31%, whereas Durasovic stands at 29.67%. Such figures are crucial for in-game live betting.

In conclusion, while both athletes present a strong case, Durasovic's consistent edge in several key areas, such as slightly higher win percentages and better form under pressure, makes them the more favorable choice to win this impending matchup based on the analyzed statistics.